Sam Bakker vs Finn Bischof Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bakker vs Bischof analysis and find out who is favored!
Sam Bakker vs Finn Bischof Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bakker 1 - 0 Bischof
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakker has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bischof has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bischof has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bischof has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakker has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 3/ 4), with Bischof winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bakker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6). Bischof has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 7/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Bakker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4), where as Bischof has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bakker winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bakker winning 2 and Bischof winning 1. The last match between Bakker and Bischof was at the M25 Oldenzaal, 27-08-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Sam Bakker getting the victory 6-0 4-6 10-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bakker and Bischof have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bakker winning 1 times and Bischof 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bakker winning 0, and Bischof 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Bischof has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakker has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bischof has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bischof has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Sam Bakker
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
Finn Bischof
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
24% (6-19)
Career Total W/L
32% (12-25)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sam Bakker | Finn Bischof |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 20 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 4-6 10-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sam Bakker | Finn Bischof |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 39% (12/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sam Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Jurriaan Bol
Player
Sam Bakker
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Sam Bakker
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
Player
Sam Bakker
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Finn Bischof Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Fadi Bidan
Player
Finn Bischof
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(10) 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Valerio Perruzza
Player
Finn Bischof
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 2-6 10-6 | H2H |
view more